Some things are actually not supposed to be illegal. Sometimes people got to do things that are extra cost for the government, but it doesn't endanger people, violate people's rights etc, its just going to cost more to clean up. We dont want to make these things illegal, otherwise the government is going to be in a momentum to make even more things like these illegal.
Have Law Have Life
Everyone is entitled to everything. Therefore let's absolutely and permanently strip off power from evil.
The Terms of Conditions of Content v. forterms.01
Monday, 7 July 2025
Wednesday, 8 January 2025
Permeability of the Law
Another law idea:
Law would be assesed in terms of its desired reach, the reach consists of various dimensions: Number of people, wide of space, for example. Then if the law's reach was too high, it would automatically only be guidelines for individuals.
So lets say its a bill, a bill would have permeability points of 50, so anything in the bill that regulates companies, local governments, organizations would apply to them, but since in this example the bill had tried to regulate wide of areas and numbers of people that were beyond the 50 points, smaller entities and rural areas, and individuals within the rural areas could not be permeated by the bill. However a mining site in a desolated place for example, that gathered a lot of workers and established a big corporation, might as a parent organization be subjected to the bill, because it had became "big enough"
In order for the order to permeate into smaller entitites, local governments needed to concur the bill
----------------
I imagine if this or something like this was implemented, a crazy government would want to do population control in immoral or unjust ways (even subtly), so other or surrounding governments should be able to scrutinize each other. But this is for another case
Sunday, 29 September 2024
Object of field instructions v.02c
Some things like eating and drinking on the train station is rather doable but banned. So instead of banning it through the law, or through the respectable guidelines, you could have this category "Object of on-site instructions" where the enforcer would decide if they were to allow or disallowed it. Only after you refuse the enforcer's instruction you'd be liable
Shameless plug: Please consider "Points of concerns" as well where you'd announce points of concerns that haven't become law yet, don't have to be obeyed, but local ruling could make laws out of them or if they became out of hand the executive could issue the order on the spot.
Saturday, 26 August 2023
Have Faith
Have faith that the Law is inherently benevolent because as much as it is cruel, it is inherently benevolent. That's my faith
Sunday, 13 August 2023
The way of Culture v.03b
Culture is not always bad but when it changed it's culture, for me this is a traitor. When people used law to go against humanity, the case could be made against it based on the law. It might be in the form of constitution or the basic law that's fundamental of every other laws. Also when its "lawful" to be evil, such as slavery, such is obvious and again the case could be made against it.
When cultures clashed, they went like wind and could form tornadoes. If the culture was eating chicken and suddenly it turned to cannibalism it was the culture because it were the people. Yes those who still ate chicken kept the previous culture, but the very people who were, then became, were the very people of the "new culture" therefore carried with them were our faiths.
Without Law reliance on Culture is relying on a traitor. The heart of people is none of our businesses (not property of others)
Wednesday, 15 March 2023
Order to address Concerns
A centralized government doesn't have to create laws all the time. They could make public a document of order to address concerns that should be followed up by the regional administrators.
Example:
- Regional administrators must create rules that address following concerns:
Concern 1. In order to strengthen the institution of marriage, a spouse should be able to receive government help in punishing and seek damages from the other spouse in the case of promiscuity.
And then the regional administrators would act in the wisdom of their own contexts, the public could review and raise criticism or endorsements of the approach used by the government and experts could also professionally audit and review orders issued by the regional administrators.
Concern 2. To care so that irresponsible members of the public couldn't raise cases randomly and abuse this power.
Concern 3. To care that there are special cases or traditional cultures that would vary the definition of promiscuity. Governments need to preserve such definitions without allowing ways to bypass the order.
Concern 4. That there's a clear expected punishment in respect.
Concern 5. To protect children from predators
Concern 5a. To be careful of the definition of children and the definition of child predators. Shouldn't make innocent people liable to be subject of the ruling
Concern 5b. To allow for prompt protection, prevent red tapes on this matter
Concern 5c. While giving access to enforcement for social media cases, to care so that the quality of privacy online wouldn't be reduced or damaged, while still be able to pierce through predators' veils of anonymity.
etc
Sunday, 24 July 2022
Accurate Articulation is significant and important
I've made a post in my other blog melkieh.blogspot.com, about me trying to make sense of the credit scheme in the current commercial banking.
https://melkieh.blogspot.com/2022/07/me-imaginary-banker.html
To go further here I'd like to note that terms and contexts are important. Just because something works the same doesn't mean that it is the same thing. How do we label things is going to influence the implications that comes with it. In this case for example, the taxing is going to be different. Also if we wanted to trade the security in the secondary market it's possible if we label it under this banner. Breaking apart a collateral into shares and then spread the ownership through the market while the government taxing every transactions 0,1% or lower is entirely possible as an alternative to land/building acquisition taxes.
This also another reason against talking indirectly while lying. If you wanted to bring upon what you're innuending into the black on white official realm, it's going to take a lot of accuracy. In fact innuendos are insults to accuracy, it's a minus accuracy. Why would you challenge the spirit of accuracy like that.
People are crazy strong and brain powered above the brim. As for me let me not add that extra difficulty please.
Have Law Have Life